In the battle for Michigan’s open Senate seat, Republican candidate Mike Rogers is under fire for his historical stance on healthcare and benefits for 9/11 first responders and survivors. This scrutiny comes as Rogers levels attacks against his Democratic opponent, Abdul El-Sayed, over past social media comments regarding the September 11 attacks. Rogers has drawn attention to El-Sayed’s old posts, implying they display sympathy for the attacks, a suggestion that has been met with skepticism by critics.
Rogers’ voting record reveals he opposed the 2010 James Zadroga Act, which was crucial in funding healthcare and monitoring for those exposed to hazardous conditions at Ground Zero. During debates, Rogers argued that the bill posed financial risks to the nation. Despite his opposition, the legislation passed in the House, overcoming resistance from many Republican members, including Rogers. Additionally, in 2002, Rogers voted against a bill that included more funding for veterans’ healthcare and first responders, intended to address the financial repercussions of 9/11 on New York schools.
The former congressman has consistently opposed various initiatives aimed at providing funding, pensions, and other benefits for first responders in subsequent years. This stance has drawn criticism from 9/11 responder and healthcare advocate John Feal, who labeled Rogers’ opposition as a betrayal. Feal noted he had engaged in discussions with Rogers about the Zadroga legislation while it was under congressional consideration.
Adding to the controversy, Rogers recently claimed in a campaign email that he had personally seen Osama bin Laden’s body following the U.S. raid that resulted in the terrorist leader’s death in Pakistan. However, it was confirmed that Rogers was neither in Pakistan at the time nor in the White House Situation Room, where senior officials were monitoring the operation.
The ongoing dispute between Rogers and El-Sayed is part of a larger, closely watched Senate race that could influence the balance of power in Congress. As both candidates vie for the seat, their past actions and statements continue to be scrutinized, adding an intense layer of competition to the electoral battle.